Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
5 comments:
Is higher ed due for a downgrade?
An excerpt from “A Tottering Technocracy: Here and in Europe, the financial meltdown exposes the hollowness of our elites,” by Victor David Hanson – NRO Online
“Higher education is no longer affordable for many families, and does not guarantee well-rounded, well-educated graduates. A university debt bubble, in Fannie and Freddie fashion — together with the rise of no-frills private online certificate-granting institutions — is undermining traditional higher education.
The symptoms are unmistakable: tuition spiraling far ahead of inflation; elite faculty excused from teaching to publish esoteric articles in little-read journals; legions of poorly compensated part-time instructors and graduate-student assistants subsidizing the privileged class; political orthodoxy as an unspoken requisite for membership in the club.
An administrator is deemed successful largely for promoting “diversity” — rarely on the basis of whether costs stabilized, graduation rates increased, the need for remediation declined, or post-graduation jobs were assured on his watch. This warped system, which grew out of the bountiful 1960s, is now a vestigial organ, an odd-looking thing without an easily definable purpose.
When will the bubble burst? If the four-year university cannot ensure its graduates that they will necessarily have a better-paying job and know more than the products of an upfront credentialing factory, why incur the $200,000 cost and put up with the political indoctrination?”
"Who cares if it works?" Certainly not Kasich and Petro. Have you read about their latest attempt to piratize, I mean privatize universities? This is their SB5, Plan B, just more of the same. Goal: as little accountability as possible.
Read the following article from Insidehighered.com: http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011/08/09/ohio_could_see_legislative_fight_over_charter_university_plan
Don't forget to follow the link to Petro's proposal: http://www.hannah.com/ShowDocument.aspx?ItemID=121120
The following link is a great dramatization: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eLd8W7E6VlA
And this link will give you more info about charter universities and their consequences such a tuition increases, among other things: http://ocaaup.org/charter_toolkit
And this link is an editorial from the Columbus Dispatch on this topic.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/editorials/2011/07/30/ohio-should-stop-playing-games-with-higher-ed.html
Finally, send an email to: hotline@regents.state.oh.us or call 619-466-0887 to voice your opinion.
Did anyone notice in today's Blade that UT boasts that its' University Press " isn't academic. " Seems appropriate since the new UT isn't academic either.
Here's a link to an AAUP analysis of the recently revealed "Charter" university gambit:
http://ocaaup.org/news/story/584/20110814/Preliminary-Analysis-of-Final-Charter-University-Proposal
Particularly of note: language that would restrict or prohibit unions was not included. However, all faculty, from adjuncts and par-timers to full profs will likely find themselves teaching more/much bigger courses as caps on classes are removed in this model. Of course I'm sure if your in a discipline the admins think "relevant" you will be given fewer classes with less students. In other words, it will likely crated an additional class system (in no particular order): adjuncts/graduate TAs/part timers/junior fac/tenured fac & and then faculty in disciplines and doing research deemed important (the BOW TIE faculty).
By now everybody should know that Kasich is trying to privatize everything from the state government - JobsOhio, the prisons, the turnpike, secondary and now higher education. What's next?
Post a Comment