UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
6 comments:
This was up yesterday: http://utnews.utoledo.edu/index.php/12_06_2010/ut-names-three-founding-deans-to-head-new-colleges
Dave,
This is just lazy. A story was posted yesterday afternoon on the news page. Posts like this discredit the good work this blog does otherwise.
http://utnews.utoledo.edu/index.php/12_06_2010/ut-names-three-founding-deans-to-head-new-colleges
Thanks for these infos. We'll probably get word in this afternoon's UTUpdate--amid all the junk they post there. This doesn't negate that the general public--most of whom, I'd vuess, don't care--was informed before the people who are really affected by this were. So typical of this administration--for whatever reason! Intentional? Lack of the transparency they'd like us to believe in. Waiting for the ruling? Maybe they think that publicizing this now will sway the judge. Inept / stupid PR people? In any case, this administration is corrupt and/or incompetent; I'd say it needs to go.
Wasn't this story posted yesterday? The Blade story ran today. I don't understand how that means the general public was informed first.
I guess I'm stupid and lazy, too, since I also tried unsuccessfully to find this information after the blog post that said it was out. Or maybe not. Information like this shouldn't be that hard to find--and something like this should be announced anyway, so that we know to look for it. The arrogance and self-righteousness of posters like Anon 9:53 contribute nothing to the blog; rather, they are the ones who "... discredit the good work this blog does otherwise."
Post a Comment