Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
4 comments:
this is funny--the author(s) of the petition hide(s) their/his/her identity(ies).
And worse yet, from the point of view of this document, an innocent reader of the document might be misled into believing these petitioners represent the College and the University. They certainly don't and aren't.
They should circulate a petition against themselves--they would probably get more sympathy. Can't they be civil?
And who wrote that tortuous thing? Pomposity unchained!
This petition is the exact opposite of what one would expect from the faculty of a College of Arts and Sciences. It is a blatant attempt to silence the voices of dissent. Bad news for the UT students.
I am repeatedly hering three names associated with this petition... One is on the Executive Committee of the Faculty Senate and the other two names "come before". However, I doubt that they have the courage to say that they originated the petition.
Regardless, most of the people in A&S known exactly who they are as they have been syncophants for the Dean, the Provost and the President for some time now.
This type of nonsense is frighteningly reminiscent of the loyalty oaths that were often required of academics and others during the Red Scare of the McCarthy era. What will happen to those who will not sign? The American Association of University Professors recently had to fight against a similar effort at California State University: Loyalty Oaths Threaten Faculty Rights
The silencing of dissent on this campus is a disturbing new trend (although only one of many perpetrated by the current administration). What's next?
Post a Comment