Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
4 comments:
POMO, no? Chew on this, JdS.
"The agreement also includes a 5 percent minimum wage increase that will be applied retroactively for the current academic year (the union has been without a contract since March) and another five percent increase for next year."
Is this the UT-AAUP agreed-upon contract? Not yet, but when we strike we should be able to negotiate as good, if not better, a contract than the contract successfully negotiated only yesterday by the graduate students at the University of Oregon:https:
//www.insidehighered.com/quicktakes/2014/12/11/u-oregon-grad-students-end-strike
Way to Go Ducks!
All of this is just so much distraction. What the administration did is propose a contract that was prefaced with, 'This is our final offer, take it or leave it, you have until we count to 100 or we'll go to fact finding and if we don't like the fact finding report we will just give you naughty serfs a new contract.' The admin simply gave a deadline and then filed for fact finding. That's what the UTAAUP rejected as much as anything - a process which didn't allow time for consideration and discussion was rejected. Whether the contract was better or not is irrelevant, the admin didn't give anyone time to do anyting. It was simply take it or go sit in a corner.
Go Ducks, indeed! Yet again, graduate assistants put on a clinic as to how you get a good contract. Pay attention, faculty.
Post a Comment