Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
12 comments:
Yes, I attended. President Michael Crow shared a rousing story of the successful (from his perspective) structural transformation at ASU under his leadership. He made it clear that he did not care what anyone thought of his innovative disruptions there. He suggested that as institutions of state public higher education, ASU and UT are similarly positioned to achieve his dream of "The New American University."
However, my thought after his presentation is that UT is not very similar to ASU and that if UT continues to follow the Crow blueprint for the New American University (which boils down to the privatization of the state public institutions of higher education) we will continue to fail in achieving our academic mission.
ASU has 76,000 students paying high tuitions to support the Crow experiment. They have 10,000 exclusively online students and enrollments at ASU are rising.
In contrast, UT has shy of 20,000 students and of late declining enrollments. We have frozen tuition and faculty and staff have been slaughtered and demoralized over the past several years in a desperate attempt to make ends meet.
ASU has meanwhile been hiring faculty left and right. President Crow claimed that comprehensive history and political science learning experiences are essential to undergraduate learning at ASU. I don't see that same top-down commitment to investing taxpayer dollars in the future of these essential humanities and social sciences here at UT. How many faculty have we hired lately? How does the Jacobs Administration show respect for our main campus faculty and staff?
ASU is in fact not much like UT even though we have aspired for seven years to emulate the ASU success story. The measurable value-added to our UT academic mission over that time span has thus far been -- zilch.
Our merry-go-round on fantasy island continues in its downward spiral and seems to only pad the pockets of an increasingly bloated administration, its inexpert outside consulting firms and its other corporate cronies of all stripes.
Robert Reich was here...would have gone to hear him...but had not heard it advertised....wonder why?
Here is a sentence from the book 'Degrees of Inequality' by Suzanne Mettler. "We are squandering one of the finest U.S. accomplishments and historic legacies... a system of higher education that was long characterized by excellence and wide accessibility to what seemed to be an ever wider and more diverse group of citizens." Did Michael Crow get his speech from reading Ms. Mettler's book or did she get her book from listening to Crow? Only the highly educated know how to use cliché and jargon to make a point!
To Anonymous 7:12 pm ~
You write: "Robert Reich was here...would have gone to hear him...but had not heard it advertised....wonder why?"
Robert Reich is a liberal professor who teaches at Berkeley and wants to take away from the rich and give to the poor. He supports trade and professional unions. Need I go on?
Cause you missed the advertisement. Also he wasn't physically here: http://utnews.utoledo.edu/index.php/02_18_2014/social-injustices-topic-of-film-screening-discussion
Really what he says is that a few rich people are hoarding vast amounts of wealth to their own detriment and the detriment of the world.
http://knowhownonprofit.org/how-to/how-to-demotivate-demoralise-and-disempower-your-team
Below is something to truly "crow" about:
Feasibility study to UT mgmt re: raising student worker hourly rate from $7.95 to $10.10:
http://www.independentcollegian.com/news/higher-wages-for-student-workers-1.2860890#.Uyr9W6hdVMg
It's sort of cute how SG thinks that "asking the CFO to look into something" is an effective tactic.
So, Jacobs is stepping down effective June 30, 2015. Can we just go ahead and name Scarborough as President and cut the charade that there will be a national search? Everyone already knows that is going to happen.
Jacobs and the BOT are now weakened. It is time for the faculty to finally step up and assert their strength. Then they can have a real voice in choosing the next president.
The faculty have no real power and have not for some time, they will have no real say in selecting the new President. BOT and OBOR along with the Governor will control what happens at UT, that is just the true cruel reality at public universities all across this country. Give us just one recent example where faculty at any public university actually had a major say in their next President. And even with a national search we all know who is the next President - the current Provost. Lets not kid ourselves about any of this.
Post a Comment