Just what we need, more deans and unqualified "leaders"...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
14 comments:
When can we take a vote to censure the authors (with the exception of tenure-track faculty) of this document? Chairs and deans should expect votes of no confidence.
This MUST be a joke! I don't think anyone can come up with this crap for real. Please, tell me it's a joke!
Why wouldn't you censure the tenure-track faculty too?
Kids in a sandlot build better structures than this!
Is there anyway I can check out of this? This is a disaster in the making.
Questions:
1. Does this mean departments will be de facto abolished?
2. Does this mean department chairs will no longer be in charge of assigning classes, etc.?
3. Does this mean department faculties will lose their ability to self-govern?
4. What does this mean for the various unions of teachers (esp. the tenure-track and the lecturer bargaining units)?
5. Why is all of this being decided during the summer?
6. Why aren't we getting communication about this, if the process is transparent, etc.?
7. What the hell is a College for the Study of the Human Condition? Won't people at other universities laugh at this kind of terminology?
8. If all these layers of administration are being added, what will all these people do, besides go to meetings? Will they all be paid well into the six figures, like current administrators are? If so, where does that money come from (i.e., who gets laid off, or which program gets cut, to pay for it)?
9. It seems like all the positivity talk is meant to be comforting, but I have to say that I have an ulcer from worry about the loss of my job, and I bet I'm not the only one. I feel like the administration is playing dice with my livelihood, and I don't really know what I'll do to provide for my family if somehow UT kicks me to the curb in an economy as bad as this one. Perhaps the administration doesn't worry matters like these, but I worry them every day.
How is this strategic at this time?
By the words of the CFO: "we face a $20-$40 million FY2012 budget shortfall."
By the words of our President at the most recent Board of Trustees Meeting: "to meet this, we will need to make significant program reductions."
This plan adds two layers of bureaucracy!
I expect this was written by Lloyd Jacobs before they first meeting of the gang of 12. It was the answer to the question he charged the committee to confirm. He lives by the motto: Never ask a question (of a committee) that you (or they) don't already know the answer to. If you can come up with a structure like this in about one month, the work must have already been done.
The administrative line will be: the recommendation of the "faculty committee" is....
The entire university? except for Dr. Gold's medical school of course....
Looks like the ladies got paid by the buzzword.
I would bet a lotta dough that anon 6:55am is exactly right.
I do think the "house of cards" graphic is particularly relevant.
I think the "house of cards" is entirely relevant! This plan is a house of cards and lacks a foundation.
I think I have found the answer to this nonsense:
Either Dr. Jacobs or the Board of Trustees has a big family and needs jobs or Dr. Jacobs still has Medical School cronies to pay off with high paying positions!
So is the word on the street true? Will I be a student of The Larry Burns Perpetual Motion College of Sexuality and Sustainability when I return to UT this fall?
I can't wait to be a newly minted SS gradute!
College of the Study for the Human Condition Blog? Perhaps these changes are designed to confuse readers of this forum. If they change the names of the schools, who will look for the Arts and Sciences Forum? I smell a rat. Someone check to see if the domain name for CSHCforum is taken. :)
Post a Comment