Bloggie cannot attest to accuracy or if these numbers reflect total compensation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
UT's Officially Disapproved Information Source and HISTORICAL ARCHIVE. The only source of truth, where Paradox Manifests: Hundreds of thousands of visits. Yet No One Admits to Reading It. Welcome to the "Grey Area" where "Unethical Utterances," i.e., criticisms of administrators, are commonplace. Make U.U. here where genuine civility still reigns, a.k.a., freedom......................... UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO'S EQUIVALENT TO RADIO FREE EUROPE
Jacobs' arrogance is astonishing
It's the same old, same old at UT
. . . . Either Jacobs is misleading the media or he has misled the Board of Trustees. President Jacobs objected to "the general tone" of the UT-AAUP Newsletter. Many persons on this campus object to the "general tone" of the Jacobs Administration. During his tenure as President, he has introduced an administrative culture of fear and intimidation. . . . A point of logic must be raised here, with all respect to UT AAUP, the conclusions that President Jacobs has (1) misled the media and (2) the Board of Trustees are not mutually exclusive. Both would seem likely given his considerable talent at spinning "visions." |
2 comments:
1) Is Bill McMillen's position part-time? If it's full time, in relation to others that high up he's working for peanuts!
2) Dean Lettman might actually be the only UT administrator to legitimately claim that perhaps he is being paid "under market value." Of course he has a doctorate in an academic discipline (Psychology) as opposed to one of the professional fields and he has actually taught college courses, so for Jacobs that probably lowers Dennis' worth as an academic adminstrator.
Thanks for the info, Bloggie. A quick tally shows that these 23 people account for more than 5 million in salaries. So, comparatively speaking, this alone equals one-third of our short-fall. A 20% cut in these salaries would save us at least one million. This doesn't even count the benefits. My next question is: how much did we save by cutting the 90 or so occupied positions in the last set of layoffs? [Oh, by the way, did the University offer help with medical insurance for those people who were laid off? After all, we have this great medical campus...] Then, I'd like to know where the money budgeted for the the 200 or so vacant positions went? It obviously was not spent on salaries, but did it get shifted around somewhere? Did it get reabsorbed and for what?
Post a Comment