Wednesday, July 9, 2008
Getting Away
I would like to move away from Jake and his bus for a few moments. That Arts and Sciences is faced with problems with the dean, the provost and the president cannot be questioned. But, it is only a part of the problem. We have, in some ways, been our own worst enemy. Whenever challenged about curriculum we puff out our chests and yell, "we are the liberal arts." This is hardly a convincing answer. We need to do more than whine. We need to have convincing arguments about why a student should take a variety of courses and not merely mouth that they need to be liberally educated. Ask yourself exactly what you remember from the "liberal arts" part of your undergraduate education? What value did the in-class professor add to that education? How have you used that portion of your education? Do you even remember what classes constituted that part of your education? How many of us have looked back at our undergraduate transcripts and said, "I took that class?" The point is not to embarrass those of us who only vaguely remember the 60s but to point out that merely reciting a mantra that includes "we are the liberal arts" is not good enough.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I remember ... how my liberal arts education not only taught me the difference between "whine" and "wine" but when reading the Grapes of Wrath the utter importance of embracing uncompromising activism, if necessary, to thwart tyranny and injustice.
Myself, I do not agree with Dr. Tinkle. I AM content to do with wine. It is an excellent muse. What our liberal arts curriculum needs now is the addition of a "Seminar in Wine Appreciation: From Boone's Farm to Beringer" course. I predict mass enrollments and retentions!
digonenes
Did your liberal arts training teach you how wildly inappropriate it is to use words like "tyranny" to describe a minor squabble over administratitve decisions at a 2nd rate public university.
Dr. Tinkle, I fully agree. Hopefully this is a view that can become more muscularly asserted by a larger number of people. We have serious problems that need addressed. Serious problems call for adult answers. I completely agree that we have been shooting ourselves in the collective foot on a fairly regular basis.
Ah, Nonette ... Now there’s an adult answer straight out of the Black Forest – brute force when you run out of good arguments: call in those high steppin’ brownshirts in jackboots to do a bald-headed muscular tap dance on a few minority voices of righteous protest. Good thinking! Reaganfan1 will make a few phone calls to help out. "Tyranny" = The office, authority, or jurisdiction of an absolute ruler.
Right. So you're trying is to say Nazi without actually saying Nazi, correct?
And I would say you guys have been pretty muscular in the way you have expressed your opinion. My point was I think the opinion Dr. Tinkle expresses, and which I think I've expressed, which I do think is more mature, should be stated more forcefully. This will help, hopefully drown you guys out so that we can get what I think both groups want. A new dean. Your approach keeps the old dean.
This crap wouldn't happen if a dean had just been promoted internally, these external searches are worthless. Just a bunch of 40+ page CVs and a one-day interview, the tenure review process is much more rigorous than the dean hiring process.
"Your approach keeps the old dean."
So what is your recommended course of action?
Do you realize that for several months before the vote of no confidence that the Provost was made aware of the problems and concerns with the Dean, and by indication of the email exchanges between the Provost and President it is clear that they were aware of his limitations and yet they would simply continue with their “plans”.
If you thin that the vote or this blog represent the only approaches in use to address concerns within the College and within the Dean you have not been playing attention or involved with discussions and meetings over the last few years (even before the new Dean arrived).
Post a Comment